Case Study: EB1-A Appeal of a Wushu Master is Sustained and Petition is Approved by the AAO.

by Victoria Chen, Esq., J.D.

Background: The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act),as an alien of extraordinary ability as an alien of extraordinary ability as a Wushu coach.

USCIS Decision: The director determined the petitioner had not established that she qualifies for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. The director also determined that the petitioner had not established that she would be continuing work in her area of expertise.

USCIS’s Reasons of Denial: The petitioner seeks classification as an alien of extraordinary ability as a martial arts teacher and consultant. The director noted that the record does not support a finding that the petitioner has extraordinary ability as a teacher or consultant because most of the evidence supports the alien as an extraordinary athlete. The director therefore determined that the petitioner does not intend to continue work in her area of expertise.

Inconsistant classifications: The AAO noted taht it appears that the petitioner is in fact classifiable as an alien of extraordinary ability as an athlete. The petitioner noted on appeal that the fact that the petitioner was awarded the silver medal at the 1985 Xian International Wushu Invitational Tournament indicates that she was officially recognized as the number two women’s Wushu athlete in the world. It also appears that on one occasion she served as a judge of other Wushu athletes at a competition, based on her status as a renowned Wushu athlete.

The recommendation letters submitted by the petitioner indicate that the beneficiary is a highly talented and accomplished athlete. Additionally, various newspaper articles were submitted which either were written specifically about the petitioner and her accomplishments at various Wushu competitions, or mentioned the petitioner while discussing the sport of Wushu in general.

AAO’s Decision: Regardless of inconsistant classifications, the AAO decided that being an extraordinary athlete is related to being an extraordinary teacher. The AAO opined that the petitioner’s qualifications to be a Wushu coach are clearly based on the knowledge and experience which she gained as a Wushu athlete. It appears that there is a logical nexus between her success and expertise as an athlete and her ability to coach the same sport. As a coach the petitioner will employ the same skills and knowledge which she acquired as an athlete. The petitioner has established extraordinary ability as a Wushu athlete. It is concluded that the petitioner has established that she qualifies as an alien of extraordinary ability pursuant to section 203(b)(1)(A) of the Act.

The AAO therefore decided that the petitioner has met the burden of prrof. Accordingly, the decision of the director was withdrawn, and the appeal was be sustained by the AAO.

from Chen Immigration Law Associates

North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) is a U.S. immigration law firm dedicated to representing corporations, research institutions, and individuals from all 50 U.S. states regarding I-140 immigration petitions. We specialize in employment-based immigration petition and have a proven record of high success rate for the categories of: EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver), EB1-A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB1-B (Outstanding Researcher/Professor) and O-1 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability).

Our Ten Thousand I-140 Approvals Provide Unprecedented Insight into the USCIS Adjudication Trend

With more than 47,000 EB-1A, EB-1B, EB-2 NIW and O-1 cases approved, we have first hand information on the manner in which the USCIS adjudicate I-140 cases. As the USCIS has constantly changed its adjudication standards for the EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-2 NIW categories, our firm's huge database of successful cases gives you unprecedented insight to USCIS adjudication trends. We carefully analyze the data for all of our cases and apply the results of our analyses toward giving our clients up-to-date advice and adapting our strategies such that we remain on par with the ever-shifting landscape of immigration law in the U.S. With us, you will always have access to important updates, strategies, and information so that you can make the most informed decisions about your case.

We Have Helped Hundreds and Thousands of Clients with Credentials and Backgrounds Similar to Yours

With our exceedingly large number of successful petitions, no matter what credentials you have, no matter your background and field of expertise, no matter your visa status or nationality, chances are we have helped hundreds or even thousands of clients just like you. Our clients are usually impressed with how well we understand their research and work. Our insight and understanding stems from the fact that we have handled many cases with elements similar to yours already, and this helps us devise the best strategies for each individual petition.

Vast Majority of Clients Came to Us Because of Referrals

For years, our firm has attracted new clients based solely on word of mouth, recommendations, and the positive collaboration experiences shared with them by their friends and family. We take pride in our reputation and work hard to ensure that we provide a green card application experience that our clients are happy to share with their friends and colleagues. That is how our approved cases grew from 600 in 2013 to over 47,000 in 2023.